Today's hottest deals

Casper EXCALIBUR G870

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
3 months ago, 1 month ago.
SystemCasper EXCALIBUR G870  (all builds)
MotherboardCASPER NLXB 001
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230417
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 04 '24 at 16:38
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12450H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 77.2
1-Core 178
2-Core 346
105% 200 Pts
4-Core 672
8-Core 991
104% 832 Pts
64-Core 1,246
77% 1,246 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 101%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060 (Laptop)
Quanta(152D 1521) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 556.12
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
109% Outstanding
Lighting 141
Reflection 155
Parallax 151
115% 149 fps
MRender 191
Gravity 111
Splatting 96.4
104% 133 fps
Poor: 83%
This bench: 109%
Great: 129%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 510 SSD ZP250GM30001 250GB
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: STPSC014
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,205
Write 1,190
Mixed 995
252% 1,130 MB/s
4K Read 44.4
4K Write 60.7
4K Mixed 45
157% 50 MB/s
DQ Read 834
DQ Write 125
DQ Mixed 260
246% 406 MB/s
Poor: 109% Great: 216%
CT500P3SSD8 500GB
345GB free
Firmware: P9CR30A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,506
Write 1,596
Mixed 1,372
334% 1,491 MB/s
4K Read 51.8
4K Write 59
4K Mixed 64
192% 58.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,290
DQ Write 125
DQ Mixed 235
291% 550 MB/s
Poor: 82% Great: 305%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS632A.M4FF 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
84% Excellent
MC Read 33.6
MC Write 29.3
MC Mixed 28
87% 30.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 35.2
SC Mixed 22.7
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 84.9
47% 84.9 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 84%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 19: 0P 3R 0G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
19% 19% 37 212 56 144 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0910
Typical EXCALIBUR G870 Builds (Compare 448 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

System: Casper EXCALIBUR G870

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback