Today's hottest deals

MSI X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive175% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B79
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79)  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180403
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 03 '24 at 23:15
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$67
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
62% Good
Memory 71.8
1-Core 84.4
2-Core 159
61% 105 Pts
4-Core 282
8-Core 416
44% 349 Pts
64-Core 447
28% 447 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440
Nvidia(10DE 1097) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 552.55
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Lighting 19.9
Reflection 16.7
Parallax 18.5
16% 18.4 fps
MRender 22.5
Gravity 21.7
Splatting 16
16% 20.1 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL4256HBJD-00BL7 256GB
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CL2QHXC7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1099 1126 995 161 156 168 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
175% Outstanding
Read 1,328
Write 1,157
Mixed 1,086
SusWrite 618
235% 1,047 MB/s
4K Read 52.1
4K Write 74.1
4K Mixed 54.7
188% 60.3 MB/s
DQ Read 746
DQ Write 438
DQ Mixed 612
450% 598 MB/s
Poor: 125%
This bench: 175%
Great: 272%
Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$40
147GB free
Firmware: JF100-19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 74 73 74 73 73 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 66.4
Write 75
Mixed 47.1
SusWrite 73.7
48% 65.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 42%
WD WD20EURX 2TB-$38
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 105 107 104 117 107 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 118
Write 132
Mixed 67.8
SusWrite 108
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2C3000C15 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2800 MHz clocked @ 1400 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
43.1% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 15.3
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 15.4
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 95.6
42% 95.6 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 32" 1280 720 MST0030 HDMI
Typical X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 1,510 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79) - $100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $616
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $219Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback