PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 175% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7B79 |
Motherboard | MSI X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79) (all builds) |
Memory | 9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.8 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180403 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Jul 03 '24 at 23:15 |
Run Duration | 156 Seconds |
Run User | ZAF-User |
Background CPU | 25% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
62%
Good
|
61% 105 Pts
|
44% 349 Pts
|
28% 447 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440
Nvidia(10DE 1097) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 552.55
|
16.1%
Very poor
|
16% 18.4 fps
|
16% 20.1 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung MZVL4256HBJD-00BL7 256GB
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CL2QHXC7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1099 1126 995 161 156 168 MB/s
|
175%
Outstanding
|
235% 1,047 MB/s
|
188% 60.3 MB/s
|
450% 598 MB/s
|
![]() Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$40
147GB free
Firmware: JF100-19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 74 73 74 73 73 MB/s
|
40.3%
Average
|
48% 65.6 MB/s
|
155% 1.03 MB/s
|
|
![]() WD WD20EURX 2TB-$38
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 105 107 104 117 107 MB/s
|
64.6%
Good
|
78% 106 MB/s
|
129% 0.9 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Corsair CMW32GX4M2C3000C15 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2800 MHz clocked @ 1400 MHz
|
43.1%
Average
|
42% 14.7 GB/s
|
41% 14.3 GB/s
|
42% 95.6 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 69 | 57 | 60 | 32" | 1280 720 | MST0030 HDMI |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $190Bench 76%, 159,077 samples | 438x |
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $175Bench 74%, 142,983 samples | 209x |
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $140Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 189x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples | 99x |
RX 580AMD $120Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 76x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 73x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 103% - Outstanding | Total price: $616 |