Lenovo 83DM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive229% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 83DM  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory0.7 GB free of 8 GB
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240521
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJul 02 '24 at 21:33
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS
FP8, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 58
1-Core 178
2-Core 292
93% 176 Pts
4-Core 520
8-Core 894
86% 708 Pts
64-Core 1,065
66% 1,065 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 760M Graphics
Legend(17AA 3816) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 23.20.28.04
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.9% Poor
Lighting 33.2
Reflection 23.4
Parallax 48.6
27% 35.1 fps
MRender 23.4
Gravity 44.5
Splatting 55.4
35% 41.1 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 38%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS512GEJ4X112N 512GB
392GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51040C31
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1405 1124 1315 1800 1744 1780 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
229% Outstanding
Read 1627
Write 1,853
Mixed 1,442
SusWrite 1,528
364% 1,613 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 86.4
4K Mixed 33.9
151% 53.7 MB/s
DQ Read 799
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 808
536% 650 MB/s
Poor: 98%
This bench: 229%
Great: 319%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT62F512M32D2DR-031 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
125% Outstanding
MC Read 44.5
MC Write 48.7
MC Mixed 45
132% 46.1 GB/s
SC Read 32.6
SC Write 53.8
SC Mixed 37.3
118% 41.2 GB/s
Latency 160
25% 160 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 125%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 54 60 16" 1280 720 LEN8986
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $268Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback