Today's hottest deals

HP Desktop M01-F1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics18.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive163% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Desktop M01-F1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 87D6
Memory4.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210917
Uptime5 Days
Run DateJul 02 '24 at 06:12
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 4700G
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Memory 72.1
1-Core 145
2-Core 273
88% 163 Pts
4-Core 536
8-Core 1,004
92% 770 Pts
64-Core 1,484
92% 1,484 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
HP(103C 87D6) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.40.52.07
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
18.9% Very poor
Lighting 24.3
Reflection 19.1
Parallax 32.6
20% 25.3 fps
MRender 10.7
Gravity 28
Splatting 22.4
17% 20.4 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix BC511 HFM512GDJTNI-82A0A 512GB
236GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 699 479 496 367 472 415 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
163% Outstanding
Read 1,003
Write 933
Mixed 970
SusWrite 488
191% 849 MB/s
4K Read 46
4K Write 89.4
4K Mixed 58
191% 64.5 MB/s
DQ Read 745
DQ Write 750
DQ Mixed 475
432% 657 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 163%
Great: 203%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
99GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 119 122 114 114 115 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
71% Very good
Read 130
Write 134
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 117
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 71%
Great: 75%
Samsung Flash Drive FIT 128GB
22GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 58 58 58 56 59 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 10% Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4U9S8MD-8 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.7% Good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 24.4
MC Mixed 21.6
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 25.2
SC Mixed 21.8
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 16: 0P 1R 2G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
16% 14% 59 92 56 75 23.9" 1920 1009 SAM707D LF24T35
Typical Desktop M01-F1xxx Builds (Compare 1,157 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP Desktop M01-F1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 111% - Outstanding Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback