Acer Aspire A315-510P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.87% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire A315-510P  (all builds)
MotherboardADN GardenParty_ADN
Memory1.1 GB free of 8 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230808
Uptime3.5 Days
Run DateJul 02 '24 at 03:41
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-N305
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
48.3% Average
Memory 34.5
1-Core 61.4
2-Core 151
42% 82.2 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 640
58% 486 Pts
64-Core 628
39% 628 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 1656) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4032
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
6.87% Terrible
Lighting 7.8
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 8.9
6% 9.4 fps
MRender 10.6
Gravity 10.1
Splatting 8.6
8% 9.77 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.87%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Phison NVMe PM80512GPYTASBACIA-E132 512GB
345GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFME0.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1108 448 254 248 271 266 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 706
Write 1,282
Mixed 909
SusWrite 432
189% 832 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 66.5
4K Mixed 38.9
125% 43.9 MB/s
DQ Read 764
DQ Write 437
DQ Mixed 656
473% 619 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 120%
Great: 198%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9JCNNNCP3MLYR-N6E 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.7% Good
MC Read 24.9
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 26.8
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 12.6
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 186
22% 186 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 15.5" 1536 793 BOE07CB
Typical Aspire A315-510P Builds (Compare 68 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A315-510P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback