Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-AORUS 17 XE4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AORUS 17 XE4  (all builds)
Memory22.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220307
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJul 01 '24 at 20:18
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Memory 57.1
1-Core 184
2-Core 358
101% 200 Pts
4-Core 638
8-Core 1,074
104% 856 Pts
64-Core 1,835
114% 1,835 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 102%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Gigabyte(1458 79AD) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3301
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
21% Poor
Lighting 25
Reflection 28
Parallax 27.4
20% 26.8 fps
MRender 25.9
Gravity 35
Splatting 22.6
22% 27.8 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 21%
Great: 21%
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti (Laptop)
Gigabyte(1458 79AD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1785 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 556.12
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
126% Outstanding
Lighting 171
Reflection 189
Parallax 173
139% 178 fps
MRender 190
Gravity 136
Splatting 120
118% 148 fps
Poor: 96%
This bench: 126%
Great: 135%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 1TB
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIOM31.4
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,744
Write 3,331
Mixed 2,419
634% 2,832 MB/s
4K Read 70.4
4K Write 236
4K Mixed 106
368% 138 MB/s
DQ Read 1,635
DQ Write 1,184
DQ Mixed 1,456
1,075% 1,425 MB/s
Poor: 239% Great: 482%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend TS2666HSB-16G 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
71% Very good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 24.9
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 18.8
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 71%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 44 8 144 17.3" 2560 1368 SHP1563 LQ173M1JW12
Typical GA-AORUS 17 XE4 Builds (Compare 227 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 122%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AORUS 17 XE4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback