Micro Uranus Series

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics9.43% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro Uranus Series  (all builds)
MotherboardShenzhen RPFXI
Memory54.8 GB free of 64 GB
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240527
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 01 '24 at 02:21
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 74.5
1-Core 188
2-Core 379
110% 214 Pts
4-Core 757
8-Core 1412
130% 1,084 Pts
64-Core 3,194
198% 3,194 Pts
Poor: 108%
This bench: 108%
Great: 120%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(0000 0000) 128MB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.5186
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
9.43% Terrible
Lighting 10.6
Reflection 16
Parallax 11.8
9% 12.8 fps
MRender 14.4
Gravity 14.9
Splatting 11.6
11% 13.6 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.43%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000T500SSD8 1TB
870GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P8CR002
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,801
Write 3,837
Mixed 2,736
771% 3,458 MB/s
4K Read 60.9
4K Write 223
4K Mixed 101
340% 128 MB/s
DQ Read 1,489
DQ Write 1,129
DQ Mixed 1,288
969% 1,302 MB/s
Poor: 220% Great: 658%
Shiji 512GB M.2-NVMe 512GB
239GB free
Firmware: T1103L0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,367
Write 1,410
Mixed 964
278% 1,247 MB/s
4K Read 38.5
4K Write 206
4K Mixed 26.2
201% 90.2 MB/s
DQ Read 665
DQ Write 1015
DQ Mixed 25.6
248% 568 MB/s
Poor: 125% Great: 244%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT32G56C46S5.M16B2 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
179% Outstanding
MC Read 74.1
MC Write 71.2
MC Mixed 69.2
204% 71.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 44.2
SC Mixed 29.3
88% 30.9 GB/s
Latency 93.6
43% 93.6 ns
Poor: 116%
This bench: 179%
Great: 175%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 27.5" 1280 720 SAM0C4C U28E590
Typical Uranus Series Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 170%
UFO

System: Micro Uranus Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $293
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback