Intel X99-P4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemINTEL
MotherboardIntel X99-P4  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20240118
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 30 '24 at 21:41
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
67.6% Good
Memory 77.8
1-Core 82.2
2-Core 160
63% 107 Pts
4-Core 309
8-Core 622
55% 465 Pts
64-Core 1,229
76% 1,229 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 71%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar NM620 1TB
734GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9846
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,836
Write 1,892
Mixed 1,632
399% 1,787 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 63.2
4K Mixed 48.6
155% 50.3 MB/s
DQ Read 627
DQ Write 272
DQ Mixed 484
349% 461 MB/s
Poor: 170% Great: 348%
Samsung HD161GJ 160GB-$25
60GB free
Firmware: 1AC01118
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 116
Write 122
Mixed 60.4
74% 99.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 62%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 64GB
14GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 32.5
Write 10.9
Mixed 16.5
22% 20 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 3.3
208% 3.47 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown VMA45UG-MEC1U22T3 2x8GB
2 of 16 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.1% Good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 20.5
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 14.7
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 83.9
48% 83.9 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 0" 1280 720
Typical X99-P4 Builds (Compare 369 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X99-P4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback