Today's hottest deals

Win M600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics35.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive252% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemWin M600  (all builds)
MotherboardWin M600
Memory9.8 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230919
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateJun 30 '24 at 05:17
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Memory 52.9
1-Core 178
2-Core 328
95% 186 Pts
4-Core 616
8-Core 982
98% 799 Pts
64-Core 1,244
77% 1,244 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M
Device(1F66 0031) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing below potential (53rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35.5% Below average
Lighting 41.1
Reflection 9.8
Parallax 52.7
34% 34.5 fps
MRender 9
Gravity 42.5
Splatting 78
39% 43.2 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 54%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
KPART512GBC2DVS 512GB
272GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW000001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1478 557 555 560 560 568 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
252% Outstanding
Read 1,918
Write 1,976
Mixed 1163
SusWrite 713
323% 1,442 MB/s
4K Read 52.2
4K Write 163
4K Mixed 75.9
262% 97 MB/s
DQ Read 1,260
DQ Write 1,008
DQ Mixed 1,015
792% 1,094 MB/s
Poor: 169%
This bench: 252%
Great: 283%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G56C46S5.M8G1 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
114% Outstanding
MC Read 49.8
MC Write 30.1
MC Mixed 50.6
124% 43.5 GB/s
SC Read 24.9
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 34.6
79% 27.6 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 110%
This bench: 114%
Great: 165%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 54 165 23.8" 1280 720 ACR0759 XV240Y V
Typical M600 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft

System: Win M600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback