HP Laptop 14s-dq2xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.23% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive163% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 14s-dq2xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 87FD
Memory1.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231004
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJun 30 '24 at 00:56
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
61.9% Good
Memory 70.1
1-Core 119
2-Core 150
67% 113 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 361
43% 331 Pts
64-Core 368
23% 368 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
HP(103C 87FD) 128MB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.5186
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
9.23% Terrible
Lighting 10.1
Reflection 11.8
Parallax 14.5
8% 12.1 fps
MRender 11.3
Gravity 16.2
Splatting 13.3
11% 13.6 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.23%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KBG50ZNV512G KIOXIA 512GB
275GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP01AN00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 927 408 422 380 346 427 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
163% Outstanding
Read 1,628
Write 1,361
Mixed 1213
SusWrite 485
262% 1,172 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 70.4
4K Mixed 49.7
166% 54.4 MB/s
DQ Read 416
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 352
268% 364 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 163%
Great: 244%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT8GA64D88CX3S-JR 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
41.6% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 12.3
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 12.7
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 45 9 60 14" 1280 720 BOE09D1
Typical Laptop 14s-dq2xxx Builds (Compare 886 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: HP Laptop 14s-dq2xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback