Today's hottest deals

Asrock H410M-HDV/M.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics87.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive42.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock H410M-HDV/M.2  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200511
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 29 '24 at 18:57
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User KWT-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700-$222
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Memory 92.1
1-Core 142
2-Core 280
95% 172 Pts
4-Core 513
8-Core 971
88% 742 Pts
64-Core 1,489
92% 1,489 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$140
Gigabyte(1458 3FC1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 556.12
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
87.7% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 123
Parallax 107
90% 113 fps
MRender 128
Gravity 94.1
Splatting 89.8
83% 104 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UJ400400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 118 68 81 102 117 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 430
Write 351
Mixed 301
SusWrite 107
66% 297 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 43
4K Mixed 5
60% 22.7 MB/s
DQ Read 65.7
DQ Write 15.2
DQ Mixed 33.8
27% 38.2 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 55%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
624GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 170 168 170 169 169 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 187
Write 186
Mixed 114
SusWrite 169
121% 164 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.1
224% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 102%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
922GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 187 184 188 187 185 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 191
Write 180
Mixed 119
SusWrite 186
124% 169 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
224% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 108%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905734-059.A00G 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
48.6% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 13.8
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 16.2
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 63.2
63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 48: 0P 5R 5G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
48% 19% 96 532 454 60 27" 2560 1377 HPN3583 HP 27xq
Typical H410M-HDV/M.2 Builds (Compare 683 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asrock H410M-HDV/M.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $335
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback