Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire E1-571

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire E1-571  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer EA50_HC_CR
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130219
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 29 '24 at 18:50
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
50.6% Above average
Memory 67.5
1-Core 74.5
2-Core 145
56% 95.5 Pts
4-Core 197
8-Core 194
26% 196 Pts
64-Core 195
12% 195 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Acer(1025 064B) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.09% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 2.7
3% 2.8 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.5
3% 3.67 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.09%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Walram 128G 128GB
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HC2705H3
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 236
Write 212
Mixed 203
48% 217 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 31.8
4K Mixed 10.5
62% 21.2 MB/s
DQ Read 102
DQ Write 163
DQ Mixed 15.6
45% 93.5 MB/s
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB
463GB free
Firmware: 2AR10001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 96
Write 66.2
Mixed 50.7
53% 71 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 59%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
5GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 29.3
Write 3.2
Mixed 5.2
11% 12.6 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 2.5
148% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung SAMSUNG-4G1600HS 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
50.4% Above average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 17.6
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 15.1
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO26EC
Typical Aspire E1-571 Builds (Compare 689 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E1-571

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $125
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback