Asrock A620I Lightning WiFi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics53.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive311% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsrock A620I Lightning WiFi  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock A620I Lightning WiFi
Memory16.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20240510
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 29 '24 at 15:58
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G-$299
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Memory 60.1
1-Core 188
2-Core 376
105% 208 Pts
4-Core 737
8-Core 1,175
118% 956 Pts
64-Core 1,731
107% 1,731 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M
ASRock(1849 35BF) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.5.1
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Lighting 59.4
Reflection 30.2
Parallax 96.9
48% 62.2 fps
MRender 29.6
Gravity 76.5
Splatting 109
63% 71.6 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 2TB-$165
777GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3412 1370 1374 1399 1388 1368 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
311% Outstanding
Read 1,896
Write 3,798
Mixed 3,039
SusWrite 1,718
594% 2,613 MB/s
4K Read 54.8
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 73.4
231% 76.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,455
DQ Write 1,172
DQ Mixed 1,324
988% 1,317 MB/s
Poor: 286%
This bench: 311%
Great: 587%
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 1TB
1TB free
Firmware: 4B2Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2165 2155 2154 2155 2151 2151 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
362% Outstanding
Read 2,312
Write 2,222
Mixed 2,101
SusWrite 2,155
496% 2,198 MB/s
4K Read 58.1
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 75.2
240% 79.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,543
DQ Write 1,293
DQ Mixed 1,416
1,062% 1,418 MB/s
Poor: 183%
This bench: 362%
Great: 431%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
2TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 139 134 136 131 138 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Read 126
Write 98.6
Mixed 93.4
SusWrite 135
84% 113 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.6
283% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX 6400 C32 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
111% Outstanding
MC Read 49.4
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 58.5
126% 43.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 25.3
SC Mixed 20.2
59% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 150
27% 150 ns
Poor: 141%
This bench: 111%
Great: 215%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 34.1" 1280 720 GSM772E LG HDR WQHD
Typical A620I Lightning WiFi Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

System: Asrock A620I Lightning WiFi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 128% - Outstanding Total price: $464
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $60
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback