Today's hottest deals

Asrock H510M-HDV/M.2 SE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics5.47% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsrock H510M-HDV/M.2 SE  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock H510M-HDV/M.2 SE
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230505
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJun 28 '24 at 22:31
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900KF
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 76.5
1-Core 178
2-Core 353
106% 202 Pts
4-Core 666
8-Core 1,114
108% 890 Pts
64-Core 1,325
82% 1,325 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 101%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
HP(103C 2B4E) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.64
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
5.47% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 5.4
Parallax 8.2
6% 6.8 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 7.2
5% 6.37 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.47%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AGI1T0GIMAI298 1TB
871GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VC2S038E
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,871
Write 1,648
Mixed 1274
355% 1,598 MB/s
4K Read 55.9
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 72
246% 86.4 MB/s
DQ Read 833
DQ Write 1,032
DQ Mixed 1,011
741% 959 MB/s
Poor: 101% Great: 298%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$39
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 144
Write 136
Mixed 79.1
89% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
INNO124308 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
MC Read 38.2
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 22.1
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 21.4
SC Write 27.6
SC Mixed 24.6
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 86.3
46% 86.3 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 58 60 24.1" 1280 720 LEN1144 LEN LT2452pwC
Typical H510M-HDV/M.2 SE Builds (Compare 333 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

System: Asrock H510M-HDV/M.2 SE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $375
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback