MSI PRO A620M-E (MS-7E28)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics145% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7E28
MotherboardMSI PRO A620M-E (MS-7E28)  (all builds)
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240607
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 28 '24 at 17:00
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7500F
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 81.6
1-Core 181
2-Core 339
107% 200 Pts
4-Core 667
8-Core 1,028
105% 847 Pts
64-Core 1,328
82% 1,328 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 103%
Great: 114%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$390
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 556.12
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
145% Outstanding
Lighting 194
Reflection 191
Parallax 206
158% 197 fps
MRender 298
Gravity 165
Splatting 124
151% 196 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 145%
Great: 157%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kioxia-exceria PLUS SSD 500GB
334GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFA10.7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,445
Write 2,144
Mixed 1,624
391% 1,738 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 64.8
4K Mixed 23.8
120% 41.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,586
DQ Write 1,126
DQ Mixed 1311
991% 1,341 MB/s
Poor: 124% Great: 263%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CP16G56C46U5.C8D 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
160% Outstanding
MC Read 58.9
MC Write 56.7
MC Mixed 56.7
164% 57.4 GB/s
SC Read 52.6
SC Write 58.8
SC Mixed 55.3
159% 55.6 GB/s
Latency 77.1
52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 135%
This bench: 160%
Great: 179%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 165 27" 1280 720 SAM71DC LS27AG32x
Typical PRO A620M-E (MS-7E28) Builds (Compare 79 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI PRO A620M-E (MS-7E28)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $293
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback