Gigabyte GA-A520M K V2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics86.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive84.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A520M K V2  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230808
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 28 '24 at 15:16
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 5600-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G Vega Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
76.1% Very good
Memory 75.8
1-Core 98.9
2-Core 214
72% 130 Pts
4-Core 441
8-Core 442
59% 442 Pts
64-Core 444
28% 444 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5600-XT-$300
AMD(1002 0B36) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 6GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 124
Parallax 159
90% 131 fps
MRender 98.6
Gravity 120
Splatting 76.9
79% 98.7 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 87%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingbank KP330 960GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN4763
SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 442 447 454 452 447 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 43.7
Write 57.9
Mixed 134
SusWrite 447
39% 170 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 56.1
4K Mixed 43.8
142% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 240
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 269
199% 260 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown VMA45UG-MEC1U22T3 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 37.5
MC Write 38.7
MC Mixed 34.9
106% 37 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 39
SC Mixed 26.9
85% 29.9 GB/s
Latency 89
45% 89 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 101%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 1: 0P 0R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
1% 4% 28 210 49 60 0" 1280 720 IPS0001 HDMI
Typical GA-A520M K V2 Builds (Compare 355 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A520M K V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 121% - Outstanding Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback