Gigabyte GA-TRX50 AERO D

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive518% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-TRX50 AERO D  (all builds)
Memory46.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231124
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 28 '24 at 07:19
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX 24-Cores
SP6, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 76.2
1-Core 203
2-Core 402
117% 227 Pts
4-Core 745
8-Core 1,494
132% 1,120 Pts
64-Core 5,355
331% 5,355 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 108%
Great: 115%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-XT-$334
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.20.16
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
105% Outstanding
Lighting 115
Reflection 139
Parallax 245
94% 166 fps
MRender 220
Gravity 116
Splatting 146
129% 160 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB-$150
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 620331WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4209 4242 3090 1826 1921 1967 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
518% Outstanding
Read 4,488
Write 4,402
Mixed 3,322
SusWrite 2,876
847% 3,772 MB/s
4K Read 67
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 81
280% 96.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1979
DQ Write 1,463
DQ Mixed 1,687
1,270% 1,710 MB/s
Poor: 293%
This bench: 518%
Great: 666%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG84MEBRA174N 2x31.5GB
2 of 8 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
210% Outstanding
MC Read 130
MC Write 51.2
MC Mixed 62.8
233% 81.4 GB/s
SC Read 40.7
SC Write 57.1
SC Mixed 46.6
138% 48.1 GB/s
Latency 87.2
46% 87.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 24 3 60 32" 1280 720 BNQ8020 BenQ LCD
Typical GA-TRX50 AERO D Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 397%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 704%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-TRX50 AERO D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $1,500
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback