HP Envy x360 2-in-1 Laptop 14-fa0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics17.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive171% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Envy x360 2-in-1 Laptop 14-fa0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8C69
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240411
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 26 '24 at 17:45
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS
FP8, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
59.3% Above average
Memory 27.2
1-Core 149
2-Core 245
70% 140 Pts
4-Core 489
8-Core 703
75% 596 Pts
64-Core 814
50% 814 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon TM Graphics
HP(103C 8C69) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.20.56.08
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
17.9% Very poor
Lighting 18.8
Reflection 20.8
Parallax 30.2
15% 23.3 fps
MRender 11.9
Gravity 26.7
Splatting 39.5
23% 26 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 36%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kxg80znv512g KIOXIA 512GB
416GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP01AP40
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1058 968 1038 1261 1215 726 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
171% Outstanding
Read 1,353
Write 1,320
Mixed 1239
SusWrite 1,044
279% 1,239 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 52.6
4K Mixed 29.9
113% 37.8 MB/s
DQ Read 576
DQ Write 253
DQ Mixed 673
430% 501 MB/s
Poor: 120%
This bench: 171%
Great: 361%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H58G56AK6BX069N 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 33.3
MC Write 40
MC Mixed 36.5
105% 36.6 GB/s
SC Read 32
SC Write 37.4
SC Mixed 36.6
101% 35.3 GB/s
Latency 272
15% 272 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 100%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 64 52 60 14" 1280 720 AUOD7AD
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback