MSI MPG B650 CARBON WIFI (MS-7D74)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 121%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive428% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D74
MotherboardMSI MPG B650 CARBON WIFI (MS-7D74)  (all builds)
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240607
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 26 '24 at 16:03
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$395
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Memory 97.2
1-Core 197
2-Core 394
122% 229 Pts
4-Core 775
8-Core 1,537
137% 1,156 Pts
64-Core 1,860
115% 1,860 Pts
Poor: 105%
This bench: 121%
Great: 122%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 1TB-$120
513GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4522 2538 1806 1920 2088 2129 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
428% Outstanding
Read 2,014
Write 4,768
Mixed 3,472
SusWrite 2,501
727% 3,189 MB/s
4K Read 78.2
4K Write 232
4K Mixed 115
388% 142 MB/s
DQ Read 1,896
DQ Write 1,425
DQ Mixed 1,677
1,249% 1666 MB/s
Poor: 275%
This bench: 428%
Great: 507%
Gigabyte Aorus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$80
429GB free
Firmware: EGFM13.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3675 3759 3591 973 924 666 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
387% Outstanding
Read 2,170
Write 3,387
Mixed 2,300
SusWrite 2,265
574% 2,530 MB/s
4K Read 45.6
4K Write 215
4K Mixed 82.1
288% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 2,018
DQ Write 1,288
DQ Mixed 1,434
1,128% 1,580 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 387%
Great: 491%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F5-7600J3646G16G 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 7600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
218% Outstanding
MC Read 80.5
MC Write 68.9
MC Mixed 88.9
227% 79.4 GB/s
SC Read 68
SC Write 70.2
SC Mixed 69.9
198% 69.4 GB/s
Latency 47.1
85% 47.1 ns
Poor: 134%
This bench: 218%
Great: 231%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 165 0" 1280 720
Typical MPG B650 CARBON WIFI (MS-7D74) Builds (Compare 67 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 272%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 276%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG B650 CARBON WIFI (MS-7D74)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $1,439
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback