Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZC_FX507ZC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics15.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZC_FX507ZC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX507ZC
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220617
Uptime282.6 Days
Run DateJun 26 '24 at 03:11
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
84% Excellent
Memory 58.5
1-Core 175
2-Core 344
98% 193 Pts
4-Core 586
8-Core 846
90% 716 Pts
64-Core 1,298
80% 1,298 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 84%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Asus(1043 1CDC) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3962
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Lighting 20.9
Reflection 22.7
Parallax 26.2
17% 23.3 fps
MRender 23.3
Gravity 31.9
Splatting 0.2
13% 18.5 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
305GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,408
Write 1,452
Mixed 1,245
375% 1,702 MB/s
4K Read 78.2
4K Write 218
4K Mixed 98.1
360% 131 MB/s
DQ Read 441
DQ Write 944
DQ Mixed 405
390% 596 MB/s
Poor: 99% Great: 297%
Seagate Expansion HDD 2TB
966GB free
Firmware: 1901
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 78.3
Write 89.4
Mixed 85.4
64% 84.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 42.8
MC Write 32
MC Mixed 40.4
110% 38.4 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 30.2
SC Mixed 21.6
66% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 101%
This bench: 100%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 1: 0P 0R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
1% 10% 10 79 9 144 15.5" 1920 1009 CMN153C
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZC_FX507ZC Builds (Compare 211 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZC_FX507ZC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback