Trigkey S5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics17.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive317% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemTrigkey S5  (all builds)
MotherboardTrigkey S5
Memory23.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230329
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 25 '24 at 23:02
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Memory 75.4
1-Core 149
2-Core 291
92% 172 Pts
4-Core 554
8-Core 886
88% 720 Pts
64-Core 1,058
66% 1,058 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
AMD(1002 0123) 3GB
Ram: 3GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Lighting 21.2
Reflection 21.1
Parallax 30.1
17% 24.1 fps
MRender 15
Gravity 24.5
Splatting 21.6
17% 20.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000P3PSSD8 1TB
877GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR40A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2135 2110 2129 2365 2372 2373 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
317% Outstanding
Read 1,911
Write 2,417
Mixed 2,034
SusWrite 2,247
488% 2,153 MB/s
4K Read 48.1
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 65.4
219% 77.1 MB/s
DQ Read 920
DQ Write 685
DQ Mixed 825
610% 810 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 317%
Great: 441%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFS832A.C8FF 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.3% Very good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 24.4
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 23.6
SC Write 37.8
SC Mixed 27.4
85% 29.6 GB/s
Latency 85.6
47% 85.6 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 84.6" 1280 720 SAM0BB4 SAMSUNG
Typical S5 Builds (Compare 46 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Trigkey S5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback