Default string

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics13.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231115
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJun 23 '24 at 17:59
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U Graphics
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Memory 64.9
1-Core 149
2-Core 285
88% 166 Pts
4-Core 543
8-Core 786
83% 664 Pts
64-Core 868
54% 868 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
AMD(1002 0123) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Lighting 15.8
Reflection 11.9
Parallax 22.8
13% 16.8 fps
MRender 12.7
Gravity 18.7
Splatting 19.3
14% 16.9 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Biwin CE480V6D10H-512G 512GB
277GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.4.6.48
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,720
Write 1,652
Mixed 1,479
361% 1,617 MB/s
4K Read 52
4K Write 98.6
4K Mixed 59.6
207% 70.1 MB/s
DQ Read 921
DQ Write 659
DQ Mixed 250
333% 610 MB/s
Poor: 116% Great: 276%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown LD4S08G32C22ST 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.2% Good
MC Read 24.5
MC Write 23.2
MC Mixed 22.7
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 31.1
SC Mixed 24
70% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 1: 0P 0R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
1% 3% 39 136 56 60 72.3" 1280 720 GSM0001 LG TV
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,857 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback