PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 71.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 35.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock B365M IB-R (all builds) |
Memory | 13.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190726 |
Uptime | 2.2 Days |
Run Date | Jun 22 '24 at 18:53 |
Run Duration | 133 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 51% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Intel Core i7-9700F-$279
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
|
58%
Above average
|
71% 131 Pts
|
44% 354 Pts
|
33% 538 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$270
MSI(1462 C757) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.52
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
71.8%
Very good
|
73% 89.6 fps
|
70% 88.3 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() WD Green 480GB (2018)-$69
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG400400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 20 48 83 18 3.8 MB/s
|
35.6%
Below average
|
53% 236 MB/s
|
48% 16.8 MB/s
|
46% 83.4 MB/s
|
![]() Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
587GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 164 162 166 171 163 MB/s
|
83.9%
Excellent
|
93% 127 MB/s
|
78% 0.73 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
44.5%
Average
|
47% 16.4 GB/s
|
30% 10.4 GB/s
|
34% 117 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 19 | 1 | 120 | 31.5" | 2560 1377 | GSM7766 LG ULTRAGEAR |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i7-9700FIntel $279Bench 92%, 54,980 samples | 2,250x |
Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 880x |
Core i7-9700KIntel $259Bench 97%, 550,833 samples | 63x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $270Bench 100%, 319,148 samples | 1,214x |
GTX 1660Nvidia $209Bench 68%, 230,793 samples | 712x |
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 534x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 90% - Excellent | Total price: $549 |