AZW SER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics19.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive200% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAZW SER  (all builds)
MotherboardAZW SER
Memory20.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230615
Uptime7.5 Days
Run DateJun 22 '24 at 17:41
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Memory 77.6
1-Core 163
2-Core 325
100% 188 Pts
4-Core 625
8-Core 1,068
103% 846 Pts
64-Core 1,282
79% 1,282 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
AMD(1002 0123) 3GB
Ram: 3GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Lighting 24.2
Reflection 21.5
Parallax 32.6
20% 26.1 fps
MRender 15.9
Gravity 27.7
Splatting 21.7
18% 21.8 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000P3PSSD8 1TB
846GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR40A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 751 66 58 655 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
200% Outstanding
Read 1898
Write 2372
Mixed 1993
SusWrite 298
369% 1,640 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 64.6
210% 74.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,057
DQ Write 761
DQ Mixed 885
668% 901 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 200%
Great: 441%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFS832A.C8FF 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.2% Very good
MC Read 27
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 24.4
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 23.9
SC Write 37.1
SC Mixed 24.2
81% 28.4 GB/s
Latency 84.7
47% 84.7 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 27" 1280 720 SPT0AD7 Sceptre F27
Typical SER Builds (Compare 800 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: AZW SER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback