Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive444% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory51.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230223
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 22 '24 at 13:44
Run Duration526 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$139
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
98% Outstanding
Memory 79.9
1-Core 157
2-Core 311
97% 183 Pts
4-Core 622
8-Core 1,084
103% 853 Pts
64-Core 1,488
92% 1,488 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 98%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 552.22
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 42.4
Reflection 45.4
Parallax 40.5
35% 42.8 fps
Gravity 40.4
Splatting 35.5
33% 38 fps
Poor: 30% Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG GAMMIX S70 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.2.F.P7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3826 3897 3808 4022 4014 4035 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
444% Outstanding
Read 2,386
Write 3,880
Mixed 2,776
SusWrite 3,934
738% 3,244 MB/s
4K Read 60
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 77.1
250% 83.3 MB/s
DQ Read 760
DQ Write 606
DQ Mixed 597
470% 654 MB/s
Poor: 196%
This bench: 444%
Great: 601%
Lexar NM790 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 12237
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3361 3288 3235 3346 2248 1423 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
434% Outstanding
Read 3,629
Write 3,516
Mixed 2874
SusWrite 2,817
722% 3,209 MB/s
4K Read 57.8
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 74
239% 79.6 MB/s
DQ Read 956
DQ Write 954
DQ Mixed 930
706% 947 MB/s
Poor: 287%
This bench: 434%
Great: 637%
Micron_9300_MTFDHAL7T6TDP 7.5TB
469GB free
Firmware: 11300DU0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2431 2392 2219 2225 2161 2032 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
274% Outstanding
Read 1,446
Write 2,378
Mixed 1,232
SusWrite 2,243
414% 1,825 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 46.1
167% 65 MB/s
DQ Read 648
DQ Write 617
DQ Mixed 592
456% 619 MB/s
Poor: 187%
This bench: 274%
Great: 348%
Micron_9300_MTFDHAL7T6TDP 7.5TB
815GB free
Firmware: 11300DU0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2306 2309 2234 2391 2295 2401 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
275% Outstanding
Read 1,366
Write 2,269
Mixed 1,252
SusWrite 2,323
410% 1,802 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 44.1
162% 63.5 MB/s
DQ Read 648
DQ Write 633
DQ Mixed 588
456% 623 MB/s
Poor: 187%
This bench: 275%
Great: 348%
ST20000NM007D-3DJ103 20TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: SC03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 179 180 176 180 184 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Read 181
Write 185
Mixed 139
SusWrite 179
39% 171 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 17.8
4K Mixed 1
58% 16.7 MB/s
DQ Read 3.7
DQ Write 17
DQ Mixed 0.4
3% 7.03 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 47%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
106GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 276 277 278 278 329 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Read 478
Write 280
Mixed 335
SusWrite 304
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 62.4
4K Mixed 41.5
140% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 171
DQ Mixed 151
124% 177 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 118%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB-$270
582GB free
Firmware: ML6OA800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 48 50 45 50 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
31% Below average
Read 59.2
Write 45.5
Mixed 28.6
SusWrite 48.7
33% 45.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 31%
Great: 73%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$80
1.5TB free
Firmware: MN6OA800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 75 80 77 77 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 138
Write 124
Mixed 38.8
SusWrite 78.1
69% 94.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$70
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 76 75 80 80 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 49
Write 70
Mixed 53.9
SusWrite 76
46% 62.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.4
142% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 90%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$69
695GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 101 101 103 100 103 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 92.3
Write 89.2
Mixed 63.2
SusWrite 102
64% 86.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 88%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$69
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 112 115 115 113 116 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 117
Write 136
Mixed 75.8
SusWrite 114
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
177% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL16G36C16U4B.M8FB1 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
79.5% Very good
MC Read 33.2
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 31.3
80% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 26.5
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 31.7
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 81
49% 81 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 144%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 32" 1280 720 AUS32E1 ASUS PG32UQ
Typical ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING Builds (Compare 8,418 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING - $499

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $1,556
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback