Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZV4_FX507ZV4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics16.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive362% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZV4_FX507ZV4  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX507ZV4
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240415
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJun 21 '24 at 16:30
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Memory 76.8
1-Core 173
2-Core 322
101% 191 Pts
4-Core 560
8-Core 926
91% 743 Pts
64-Core 1,455
90% 1,455 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Asus(1043 277D) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Lighting 19.1
Reflection 26.2
Parallax 24.5
16% 23.3 fps
MRender 22.9
Gravity 27.6
Splatting 19.5
19% 23.3 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-512G-1002 512GB
434GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73101000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2403 2530 2460 2567 2489 1712 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
362% Outstanding
Read 2,401
Write 2,399
Mixed 1,787
SusWrite 2,360
504% 2,237 MB/s
4K Read 60.4
4K Write 159
4K Mixed 70.3
266% 96.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,289
DQ Write 537
DQ Mixed 964
700% 930 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 362%
Great: 465%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAG68EXNSA051N 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 41.4
MC Write 38.5
MC Mixed 36.9
111% 38.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 39.9
SC Mixed 24.5
79% 27.5 GB/s
Latency 86.6
46% 86.6 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 104%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 13: 0P 1R 1G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
13% 7% 107 216 57 144 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0B70 NE156FHM-NX6
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZV4_FX507ZV4 Builds (Compare 497 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZV4_FX507ZV4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback