Today's hottest deals

Fujitsu FMVNA7HER2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu FMVNA7HER2  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB251
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121228
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 20 '24 at 20:49
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3360M-$594
Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
59% Above average
Memory 81.8
1-Core 87.1
2-Core 160
65% 110 Pts
4-Core 212
8-Core 211
28% 212 Pts
64-Core 212
13% 212 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 59%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Fujitsu(10CF 16C1) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.27% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 2.9
3% 2.93 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.9
3% 3.9 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.27%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD0256S00 256GB
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0929A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 207 83 70 76 52 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 453
Write 387
Mixed 18.9
SusWrite 132
55% 247 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 19.4
4K Mixed 20.9
62% 18.9 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 282
DQ Mixed 44.5
82% 158 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1NBG/4G KNWMX1-ETB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
41.4% Average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 13.5
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 13.5
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 75
53% 75 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 30 37 6 60 15.5" 1280 720 FUJ5612
Typical FMVNA7HER2 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu FMVNA7HER2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $594
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback