Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230605
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 20 '24 at 03:34
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User PRI-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel N100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 0.8 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
40.8% Average
Memory 36
1-Core 99.8
2-Core 173
54% 103 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 244
35% 255 Pts
64-Core 231
14% 231 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 7270) 128MB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.5186
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
3.6% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 6.5
Parallax 4.2
3% 4.8 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 7.5
Splatting 4.3
5% 5.97 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.6%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
N900-512 512GB
325GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0819A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 355 372 358 357 268 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Read 434
Write 366
Mixed 345
SusWrite 344
84% 372 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 72.7
4K Mixed 24.1
108% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 44.3
82% 156 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 94%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$45
765GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 83 86 86 84 85 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 103
Write 116
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 84.9
66% 90.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KINSOTIN16GB2666MHZ 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 12
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 7.2
20% 7.1 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 33%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 1 75 23.8" 1280 720 EMT2380 EM2FPAB24B
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,819 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback