Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1502ZA_X1502ZA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics9.62% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive77.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1502ZA_X1502ZA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X1502ZA
Memory1.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230301
Uptime6.5 Days
Run DateJun 19 '24 at 06:17
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1220P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
30.7% Below average
Memory 10.7
1-Core 93
2-Core 160
43% 87.9 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 522
47% 396 Pts
64-Core 728
45% 728 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 1D52) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
9.62% Terrible
Lighting 12.1
Reflection 16
Parallax 13.3
10% 13.8 fps
MRender 12.7
Gravity 19.3
Splatting 4.3
9% 12.1 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.62%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
285GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 456 378 129 86 305 128 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
77.1% Very good
Read 735
Write 304
Mixed 129
SusWrite 247
78% 354 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 23.4
4K Mixed 17.2
85% 24.6 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 73.5
DQ Mixed 208
143% 181 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 297%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44BB0-CWE 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
21.4% Poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 5.9
21% 7.37 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 7.2
21% 7.43 GB/s
Latency 237
17% 237 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 64 49 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15F5
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1502ZA_X1502ZA Builds (Compare 482 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1502ZA_X1502ZA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback