Today's hottest deals

Asus K43SJ

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus K43SJ  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K43SJ
Memory3.8 GB free of 0 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 18 '24 at 23:15
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2640M
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
33% Below average
Memory 48.5
1-Core 19
2-Core 42.4
25% 36.6 Pts
4-Core 103
8-Core 109
14% 106 Pts
64-Core 100
6% 100 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 33%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 520M
Asus(1043 1742) 1GB
CLim: 740 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.73
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
1.77% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 3.1
Parallax 0.5
2% 1.9 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 2
2% 2.37 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.77%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
V-gen09sm21ar256sdk 256GB 256GB
158GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0503A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 71 76 21 9.5 131 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
34.6% Below average
Read 330
Write 315
Mixed 285
SusWrite 96.2
58% 257 MB/s
4K Read 9.7
4K Write 19.2
4K Mixed 9.8
37% 12.9 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 67.8
DQ Mixed 49
48% 77.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 90%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18
196GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 55 55 56 55 55 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
35.4% Below average
Read 68.5
Write 64.4
Mixed 42.2
SusWrite 54.8
42% 57.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
117% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 64 49 60 14" 1280 720 SEC4542
Typical K43SJ Builds (Compare 158 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K43SJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $202
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback