Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA706IC_FA706IC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics43.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive130% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA706IC_FA706IC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA706IC
Memory7.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221228
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 18 '24 at 05:52
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Memory 75
1-Core 137
2-Core 266
86% 159 Pts
4-Core 498
8-Core 785
79% 642 Pts
64-Core 1,118
69% 1,118 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050 (Laptop)
Asus(1043 120C) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.30.02.19
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.4% Average
Lighting 58.3
Reflection 52.9
Parallax 48.6
48% 53.3 fps
MRender 61.6
Gravity 36.5
Splatting 36
36% 44.7 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 65%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HBLU-00BTW 512GB
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1032 657 187 28 24 54 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 1,222
Write 1,094
Mixed 977
SusWrite 330
202% 906 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 58.6
4K Mixed 39.3
129% 43.1 MB/s
DQ Read 716
DQ Write 211
DQ Mixed 518
368% 482 MB/s
Poor: 92%
This bench: 130%
Great: 229%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
69.2% Good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 23.7
MC Mixed 23.8
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 18.5
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 88.2
45% 88.2 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 56 144 17.3" 1280 720 AUO8294
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA706IC_FA706IC Builds (Compare 145 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA706IC_FA706IC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback