MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive19.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C51
MotherboardMSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)  (all builds)
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201208
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJun 17 '24 at 22:48
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
86% Excellent
Memory 81.4
1-Core 136
2-Core 265
88% 161 Pts
4-Core 487
8-Core 835
80% 661 Pts
64-Core 1,022
63% 1,022 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 86%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$270
Nvidia(10DE 2504) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3850 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 555.99
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Lighting 135
Reflection 123
Parallax 126
110% 128 fps
MRender 144
Gravity 105
Splatting 92.7
91% 114 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 103%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1H5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 87 95 5.4 8.9 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
Read 396
Write 368
Mixed 38
SusWrite 59.1
48% 215 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0
0% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 100%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
861GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 155 163 170 162 166 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Read 161
Write 169
Mixed 41.3
SusWrite 164
97% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
148% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905702-426.A00G 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
86.1% Excellent
MC Read 34.8
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 33.7
88% 30.8 GB/s
SC Read 24.3
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 33.2
77% 27 GB/s
Latency 77.1
52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 36 3 165 23.8" 1280 720 HKC2431 24E3
Typical A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) Builds (Compare 3,907 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $295
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback