Today's hottest deals

Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.08% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive185% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer CH530
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190919
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 16 '24 at 04:47
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
78.1% Very good
Memory 84
1-Core 122
2-Core 239
83% 148 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 567
60% 478 Pts
64-Core 485
30% 485 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 2005) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7261
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.08% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 9.5
Parallax 8.3
5% 7.97 fps
MRender 11
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 11.4
8% 9.9 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.08%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-00000 256GB
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXD7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 308 309 303 304 301 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
185% Outstanding
Read 1,809
Write 1,415
Mixed 952
SusWrite 314
249% 1,123 MB/s
4K Read 47
4K Write 84.5
4K Mixed 58.5
191% 63.3 MB/s
DQ Read 878
DQ Write 641
DQ Mixed 753
564% 757 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 185%
Great: 249%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot PSD416G320081S 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78.4% Very good
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 22.4
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 34.5
SC Mixed 25.4
73% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 47 14 240 15.5" 1280 720 SHP14D4 LQ156M1JW08
Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,150 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $123
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback