Today's hottest deals

Asus Pro WS X570-ACE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 234%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 296%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics279% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus Pro WS X570-ACE  (all builds)
Memory56.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210526
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 15 '24 at 14:24
Run Duration280 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$486
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Memory 78.1
1-Core 125
2-Core 250
83% 151 Pts
4-Core 500
8-Core 996
88% 748 Pts
64-Core 2,659
165% 2,659 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$993
Palit(1569 F296) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
279% Outstanding
Lighting 401
Reflection 440
Parallax 527
327% 456 fps
MRender 569
Gravity 379
Splatting 271
317% 406 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 279%
Great: 305%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$80
123GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,640
Write 2,515
Mixed 1,868
521% 2,341 MB/s
4K Read 68.7
4K Write 153
4K Mixed 91.4
302% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,125
DQ Write 664
DQ Mixed 907
672% 898 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 346%
Corsair MP600 PRO LPX 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: EIFM31.4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1756 2552 2551 2423 2552 2551 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
365% Outstanding
Read 1,963
Write 2,478
Mixed 2,170
SusWrite 2,398
510% 2,252 MB/s
4K Read 56.8
4K Write 169
4K Mixed 98.2
302% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,250
DQ Write 788
DQ Mixed 1,009
755% 1,016 MB/s
Poor: 285%
This bench: 365%
Great: 636%
Intel SSDPEDMW800G4 800GB
580GB free
Firmware: 8EV10135
SusWrite @10s intervals: 878 886 892 890 890 889 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
195% Outstanding
Read 723
Write 879
Mixed 583
SusWrite 887
174% 768 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 173
4K Mixed 51.2
216% 87.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,242
DQ Write 854
DQ Mixed 892
708% 996 MB/s
Poor: 125%
This bench: 195%
Great: 216%
Samsung 870 EVO 4TB-$290
3TB free
Firmware: SVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 456 459 459 459 459 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 449
Mixed 451
SusWrite 454
104% 464 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 89
4K Mixed 57
186% 63.2 MB/s
DQ Read 245
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 217
163% 219 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 116%
Great: 137%
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$250
904GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 456 459 459 459 458 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 451
Mixed 389
SusWrite 453
101% 450 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 89.3
4K Mixed 47.2
159% 56.9 MB/s
DQ Read 246
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 217
164% 220 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 107%
Great: 122%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK32GX4M2Z3200C16 CMK32GX4M2D3600C18 CMK32GX4M2Z3200C16 CMK32GX4M2D3600C18 64GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 42.3
MC Write 37.6
MC Mixed 32.8
107% 37.6 GB/s
SC Read 23.8
SC Write 23.3
SC Mixed 33.3
77% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 84.6
47% 84.6 ns
Poor: 98%
This bench: 101%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 60 27.9" 1280 720 AOC2879 U2879G6
Typical Pro WS X570-ACE Builds (Compare 367 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 183%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 209%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus Pro WS X570-ACE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $1,783
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback