Today's hottest deals

Compal VAW70

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCompal VAW70  (all builds)
MotherboardCompal Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150114
Uptime3.3 Days
Run DateJun 15 '24 at 09:35
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4030U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
49.9% Average
Memory 77.3
1-Core 51.4
2-Core 97.8
48% 75.5 Pts
4-Core 134
8-Core 131
18% 133 Pts
64-Core 131
8% 131 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Compal(14C0 0075) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
2.41% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 5.3
2% 3.3 fps
MRender 3.3
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 3.7
2% 2.97 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.41%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1H5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 84 55 78 80 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Read 355
Write 182
Mixed 76
SusWrite 71.6
38% 171 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 12.8
4K Mixed 10.6
52% 14.9 MB/s
DQ Read 44.1
DQ Write 18.2
DQ Mixed 19.8
18% 27.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5469-045.A00LF 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
22.1% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 6
20% 6.83 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 6.7
19% 6.7 GB/s
Latency 85.6
47% 85.6 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 57 45 60 13.9" 1280 720 BOE05EC
Typical VAW70 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Compal VAW70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $306
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $337WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback