Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics71.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive51.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211129
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 15 '24 at 00:10
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Memory 84.4
1-Core 124
2-Core 243
84% 150 Pts
4-Core 458
8-Core 461
61% 460 Pts
64-Core 463
29% 463 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Nvidia(10DE 21C4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 555.99
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71.2% Very good
Lighting 88.5
Reflection 89
Parallax 82.5
72% 86.7 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 77.9
Splatting 70.4
69% 87.1 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 57 127 13 16 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Read 299
Write 86.4
Mixed 140
SusWrite 51.8
32% 144 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 68.7
4K Mixed 23.5
100% 38.2 MB/s
DQ Read 155
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 97
85% 128 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 85%
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$41
129GB free
Firmware: UF400400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 142 134 128 139 134 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 421
Write 348
Mixed 247
SusWrite 164
66% 295 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 32.8
4K Mixed 14.5
57% 20.4 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 97
DQ Mixed 35.3
46% 83.4 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 55%
WD Purple Surveillance 1TB (2017)-$45
269GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 102 103 103 102 102 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 116
Write 117
Mixed 73.9
SusWrite 102
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 89%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
94GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 112 110 112 111 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 110
Write 116
Mixed 75.5
SusWrite 110
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GD2.1827CC.001 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.7% Very good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 21.7
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 20.8
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 55 60 21.5" 1280 720 SAM0B3F S22D300
Typical GA-H310M H 2.0 Builds (Compare 3,772 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $241
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback