Today's hottest deals

Tulpar A5 V19.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.52% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive87.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemTulpar A5 V19.1  (all builds)
MotherboardTULPAR A5 V19.1
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220606
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 14 '24 at 15:55
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Memory 66.4
1-Core 175
2-Core 340
100% 194 Pts
4-Core 586
8-Core 803
88% 694 Pts
64-Core 1,101
68% 1,101 Pts
Poor: 85%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Device(1D05 1177) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 32.0.15.5585
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
5.52% Terrible
Lighting 4.7
Reflection 4
Parallax 3.9
4% 4.2 fps
MRender 5.8
Gravity 10.4
Splatting 14.3
9% 10.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 5.52%
Great: 45%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HALU-000H1 512GB
236GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS4NFXV
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 148 148 138 151 134 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Read 648
Write 203
Mixed 197
SusWrite 146
65% 298 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 71.5
4K Mixed 34
127% 45.3 MB/s
DQ Read 473
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 304
227% 311 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 225%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA1GS6CJR6N-XN Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E2 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
79.1% Very good
MC Read 33
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 27.6
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 20.1
63% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 12: 0P 1R 2G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
12% 9% 43 153 56 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN1521
Typical A5 V19.1 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Tulpar A5 V19.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $99
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback