Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics11.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive191% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240326
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJun 14 '24 at 14:15
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900X-$556
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Memory 91.7
1-Core 136
2-Core 274
92% 167 Pts
4-Core 547
8-Core 1,081
96% 814 Pts
64-Core 1,811
112% 1,811 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 SE
Asus(1043 835D) 1GB
CLim: 675 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 392.68
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11.6% Very poor
Lighting 13.4
Reflection 19
Parallax 13
11% 15.1 fps
MRender 20.4
Gravity 14.5
Splatting 13.3
13% 16.1 fps
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$120
732GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 233010WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1260 270 353 372 356 296 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
191% Outstanding
Read 1,455
Write 1,831
Mixed 1,418
SusWrite 485
292% 1,297 MB/s
4K Read 45.1
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 65.4
216% 77.1 MB/s
DQ Read 947
DQ Write 685
DQ Mixed 835
619% 822 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 191%
Great: 276%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$66
210GB free
Firmware: 005C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 581 54 57 92 123 38 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
169% Outstanding
Read 1,391
Write 910
Mixed 849
SusWrite 157
183% 827 MB/s
4K Read 56.2
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 72.6
255% 91.4 MB/s
DQ Read 333
DQ Write 795
DQ Mixed 337
322% 488 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 169%
Great: 209%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 640GB
540GB free
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 217 223 221 220 219 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 204
Write 205
Mixed 55.6
SusWrite 220
124% 171 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 122%
Great: 120%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/16GX KHX3200C16D4/16GX 32GB
3000, 3000 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.4% Very good
MC Read 23.2
MC Write 36.4
MC Mixed 21.2
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 25.2
SC Mixed 13.5
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 63.4
63% 63.4 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 31 215 57 60 23.1" 1280 720 GSM587D IPS235
Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,782 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $557
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback