Asus ROG CROSSHAIR X670E HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 199%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 141%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics306% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive352% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG CROSSHAIR X670E HERO  (all builds)
Memory89.6 GB free of 96 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240412
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 14 '24 at 11:06
Run Duration396 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D-$475
AM5, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
66% Good
Memory 99.8
1-Core 191
2-Core 188
98% 160 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 192
26% 191 Pts
64-Core 185
12% 185 Pts
Poor: 114%
This bench: 66%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,500
CLim: 3165 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
306% Outstanding
Lighting 436
Reflection 360
Parallax 750
355% 515 fps
MRender 522
Gravity 563
Splatting 293
359% 459 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 306%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 1TB-$105
631GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1840 2851 2819 3374 1479 1316 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
352% Outstanding
Read 2,365
Write 4,300
Mixed 3250
SusWrite 2,280
693% 3,049 MB/s
4K Read 69.3
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 89.7
298% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 642
DQ Write 477
DQ Mixed 540
409% 553 MB/s
Poor: 275%
This bench: 352%
Great: 507%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$112
922GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2389 2333 2360 2397 2256 1598 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
351% Outstanding
Read 2,646
Write 2,995
Mixed 2,884
SusWrite 2,222
607% 2,687 MB/s
4K Read 64
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 80.9
272% 93.5 MB/s
DQ Read 663
DQ Write 469
DQ Mixed 550
415% 561 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 351%
Great: 477%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
2TB free
Firmware: MX4OAD40
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 35023
Mixed 68
12,536% 17,546 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
168% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DHX CMP96GX5M2B6600C32 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
256% Outstanding
MC Read 92.9
MC Write 72.5
MC Mixed 125
277% 96.9 GB/s
SC Read 57.7
SC Write 72.9
SC Mixed 62.6
184% 64.4 GB/s
Latency 40.3
99% 40.3 ns
Poor: 127%
This bench: 256%
Great: 269%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 1038 75 240 26.7" 1280 720 AUS27FD PG27AQDM
Typical ROG CROSSHAIR X670E HERO Builds (Compare 121 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 402%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 527%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG CROSSHAIR X670E HERO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $2,262
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback