Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics91.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive201% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190410
Uptime4.3 Days
Run DateJun 13 '24 at 23:18
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$235
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
80% Very good
Memory 80.9
1-Core 119
2-Core 232
80% 144 Pts
4-Core 425
8-Core 667
67% 546 Pts
64-Core 676
42% 676 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 80%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$140
Asus(1043 869D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 555.85
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91.1% Outstanding
Lighting 114
Reflection 108
Parallax 120
92% 114 fps
MRender 133
Gravity 103
Splatting 95.2
88% 110 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
321GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 234110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1295 358 366 330 361 256 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
201% Outstanding
Read 1966
Write 1,953
Mixed 1815
SusWrite 494
349% 1,557 MB/s
4K Read 43.8
4K Write 85
4K Mixed 57.8
185% 62.2 MB/s
DQ Read 917
DQ Write 622
DQ Mixed 758
569% 766 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 201%
Great: 300%
SDM8SI960A 960GB
290GB free
Firmware: S0408B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 21 6.2 5.8 6.4 6.3 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
75% Very good
Read 504
Write 440
Mixed 396
SusWrite 69.9
79% 353 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 74.8
4K Mixed 30
126% 45.6 MB/s
DQ Read 231
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 50.8
102% 202 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 75%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3200 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
MC Read 31.7
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 23.8
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 31.7
SC Mixed 23.3
69% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 33: 0P 5R 2G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
33% 33% 27 213 58 144 24.5" 1280 720 AOC2590 2590G4
Typical TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 3,489 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $610
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback