Biostar H510MH/E 2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics96.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive89.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
22 days ago, 22 days ago.
MotherboardBiostar H510MH/E 2.0  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210224
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateJun 13 '24 at 20:02
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400F-$110
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Memory 76.4
1-Core 120
2-Core 244
80% 147 Pts
4-Core 474
8-Core 601
69% 538 Pts
64-Core 911
56% 911 Pts
Poor: 88%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-12GB
Gigabyte(1458 4099) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 555.99
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
96.8% Outstanding
Lighting 123
Reflection 107
Parallax 122
100% 117 fps
MRender 129
Gravity 114
Splatting 93.5
90% 112 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 102%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata LEGEND 740 500GB
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VC0S036B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 159 105 62 30 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Read 1,200
Write 813
Mixed 954
SusWrite 85.7
170% 763 MB/s
4K Read 8.3
4K Write 84
4K Mixed 8
67% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 359
DQ Write 423
DQ Mixed 486
340% 423 MB/s
Poor: 137%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 308%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3000 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
36.7% Below average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 9.7
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 12.2
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 85.4
47% 85.4 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 55 26 144 23.8" 1280 720 GGF2380 MG500 V2
Typical H510MH/E 2.0 Builds (Compare 578 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Biostar H510MH/E 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $365
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback