Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire TC-895

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive124% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
SystemAcer Aspire TC-895  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-895
Memory2 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210621
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 13 '24 at 02:51
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400-$123
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Memory 90.2
1-Core 117
2-Core 239
84% 149 Pts
4-Core 474
8-Core 746
75% 610 Pts
64-Core 990
61% 990 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 142C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2125
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
4.64% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 8.6
Parallax 7.3
5% 7.43 fps
MRender 9
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 0.1
4% 4.97 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.64%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1 512GB
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 599 380 374 377 379 350 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 752
Write 535
Mixed 664
SusWrite 410
132% 590 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 64.4
4K Mixed 37.8
120% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 820
DQ Write 588
DQ Mixed 636
494% 682 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 124%
Great: 157%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4U9S8HJ-8 ACR26D4U9S1KA-4 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.7% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 14.3
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 17.6
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 69.6
58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 2: 0P 0R 0G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
2% 6% 36 86 56 60 61.7" 1280 720 SEK9333 SE29HY34
Typical Aspire TC-895 Builds (Compare 1,221 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-895

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $123
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback