Today's hottest deals

Mini Quieter 4C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMini Quieter 4C  (all builds)
MotherboardMini Rev ADLN62 1.10
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231118
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJun 13 '24 at 01:52
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel N100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 0.8 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
47.1% Average
Memory 58.6
1-Core 92.5
2-Core 143
57% 97.9 Pts
4-Core 207
8-Core 209
28% 208 Pts
64-Core 208
13% 208 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1684
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
3.43% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 6.3
Parallax 4.5
3% 4.8 fps
MRender 6.3
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 5.1
4% 5.43 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.43%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Eaget Device 256GB
141GB free
Firmware: SN10660
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1404 782 51 84 82 75 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
186% Outstanding
Read 1,387
Write 842
Mixed 1,042
SusWrite 413
205% 921 MB/s
4K Read 54.5
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 69.2
234% 80.9 MB/s
DQ Read 868
DQ Write 593
DQ Mixed 682
522% 714 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 186%
Great: 223%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.7% Below average
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 13
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 14.7
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 136
30% 136 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 54 60 27" 1280 720 DELD067 DELL U2715H
Typical Quieter 4C Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Mini Quieter 4C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback