Alienware x17 R2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics148% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive260% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
17 days ago, 17 days ago.
SystemAlienware x17 R2  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0FHD6K
Memory52.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240202
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 11 '24 at 14:46
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900HK
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
74.1% Very good
Memory 68.9
1-Core 157
2-Core 265
89% 164 Pts
4-Core 428
8-Core 603
65% 515 Pts
64-Core 1,007
62% 1,007 Pts
Poor: 95%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Dell(1028 0B28) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 555.99
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
148% Outstanding
Lighting 210
Reflection 214
Parallax 208
171% 211 fps
MRender 207
Gravity 161
Splatting 146
137% 171 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 148%
Great: 151%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB
337GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1275 1349 1528 1591 1630 1606 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
260% Outstanding
Read 2,453
Write 1768
Mixed 1,726
SusWrite 1,496
416% 1,861 MB/s
4K Read 45.3
4K Write 68
4K Mixed 54.7
175% 56 MB/s
DQ Read 504
DQ Write 217
DQ Mixed 377
275% 366 MB/s
Poor: 141%
This bench: 260%
Great: 531%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMCG88MEBSA092N 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
133% Outstanding
MC Read 50.3
MC Write 53.7
MC Mixed 53.6
150% 52.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 36.9
SC Mixed 23.3
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 101%
This bench: 133%
Great: 158%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 63 51 120 17.2" 1280 720 AUO97A2
Typical x17 R2 Builds (Compare 1,364 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Alienware x17 R2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback