Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 23% Surfboard	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	5.32% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	69% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-1035G1 53,170 User benchmarks, average bench 51% UC1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 0.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	19.2% Very poor	Memory 23.7 1-Core 21.8 2-Core 40.1 17% 28.5 Pts	4-Core 80.1 8-Core 115 12% 97.5 Pts	64-Core 116 7% 116 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 19.2% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD G1 68,603 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Acer(1025 1422) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9079 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	5.32% Terrible	Lighting 5.9 Reflection 6.5 Parallax 6.3 5% 6.23 fps	MRender 8.9 Gravity 6.4 Splatting 7.9 6% 7.73 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.32% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme HFM256GDJTNI-82A 256GB 340 User benchmarks, average bench 152% 125GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 312 332 306 319 352 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	69% Good	Read 614 Write 680 Mixed 617 SusWrite 342 127% 564 MB/s	4K Read 12.1 4K Write 35.1 4K Mixed 14.7 56% 20.6 MB/s	DQ Read 167 DQ Write 122 DQ Mixed 134 103% 141 MB/s
Poor: 113% ↑ This bench: 69% Great: 186%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S1KA-4 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GB 1,316 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 2667, 2667 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	31.6% Below average	MC Read 11.1 MC Write 13.5 MC Mixed 12.6 35% 12.4 GB/s	SC Read 4.6 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 5.7 16% 5.57 GB/s	Latency 299 13% 299 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 73%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
31%	39%	23	86	53	60	15.5"	1280 720	BOE07CE

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD G1IntelBench 5%, 68,603 samples	1,711x
Iris Plus G7IntelBench 9%, 52,498 samples	41x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1x

SSD
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1 256GBKingstonBench 100%, 13,793 samples	229x
OM8PCP3512F-AA 512GBKingstonBench 119%, 4,645 samples	199x
HFM256GDJTNI-82A0A 256GBBench 134%, 2,723 samples	156x

RAM
ACR26D4S9S1KA-4 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GBKingstonBench 65%, 1,316 samples	186x
ACR26D4S9S1KA-4 8GBKingstonBench 67%, 197 samples	185x
ACR26D4S9S1KA-4 Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 8GBKingstonBench 63%, 4,994 samples	159x