HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 Laptop 16-aa0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics83.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive309% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Spectre x360 2-in-1 Laptop 16-aa0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8C17
Memory21 GB free of 32 GB
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240410
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 10 '24 at 01:08
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 22 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 7.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Memory 46.1
1-Core 181
2-Core 353
96% 193 Pts
4-Core 677
8-Core 937
102% 807 Pts
64-Core 1,563
97% 1,563 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4050 (Laptop)
HP(103C 8C17) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 32.0.15.5599
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83.2% Excellent
Lighting 108
Reflection 140
Parallax 92.7
88% 114 fps
MRender 124
Gravity 79.9
Splatting 75.7
74% 93.3 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 113%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kxg80znv2t04 KIOXIA 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP01AP40
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1803 1895 1920 2025 1948 1941 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
309% Outstanding
Read 2,501
Write 2,085
Mixed 1,895
SusWrite 1922
472% 2,101 MB/s
4K Read 50.7
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 61.2
209% 70.9 MB/s
DQ Read 873
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 763
520% 651 MB/s
Poor: 154%
This bench: 309%
Great: 490%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H58G66BK7BX067 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 7467 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
167% Outstanding
MC Read 69.3
MC Write 55.9
MC Mixed 77.6
193% 67.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 36.3
SC Mixed 27.1
76% 26.7 GB/s
Latency 142
28% 142 ns
Poor: 131%
This bench: 167%
Great: 171%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 33: 0P 5R 1G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
33% 30% 37 213 57 120 16" 1553 900 SDC41A6
Typical Spectre x360 2-in-1 Laptop 16-aa0xxx Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

System: HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 Laptop 16-aa0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback