AZW SER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics17.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive205% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAZW SER  (all builds)
MotherboardAZW SER
Memory24.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230329
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJun 07 '24 at 15:36
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Memory 78.2
1-Core 163
2-Core 322
100% 188 Pts
4-Core 600
8-Core 949
95% 775 Pts
64-Core 1,152
71% 1,152 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
AMD(1002 0123) 3GB
Ram: 3GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Lighting 21.5
Reflection 20.8
Parallax 31.2
18% 24.5 fps
MRender 15
Gravity 25.6
Splatting 21.2
17% 20.6 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT500P3PSSD8 500GB
380GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR40A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 37 383 50 319 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
205% Outstanding
Read 1,788
Write 1,841
Mixed 1,660
SusWrite 176
306% 1,366 MB/s
4K Read 49.9
4K Write 155
4K Mixed 71.1
249% 92 MB/s
DQ Read 1,170
DQ Write 870
DQ Mixed 1,019
762% 1,020 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 205%
Great: 315%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFS832A.C8FF 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.4% Very good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 23.7
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 23.9
SC Write 36.7
SC Mixed 27.7
84% 29.4 GB/s
Latency 87.4
46% 87.4 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 2: 0P 0R 0G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
2% 9% 23 44 10 30 84.6" 1280 720 SAM0D42 SAMSUNG
Typical SER Builds (Compare 800 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: AZW SER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback