Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 90JF006BUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive479% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 90JF006BUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 36E9
Memory7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200303
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 07 '24 at 06:10
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$365
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
74.9% Very good
Memory 55.9
1-Core 141
2-Core 279
82% 159 Pts
4-Core 501
8-Core 933
86% 717 Pts
64-Core 1,331
82% 1,331 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
MSI(1462 3720) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.34
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
127% Outstanding
Lighting 171
Reflection 170
Parallax 193
140% 178 fps
MRender 189
Gravity 149
Splatting 122
122% 154 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 127%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-000L7 512GB
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5M2QEXF7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 34 26 46 49 48 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
479% Outstanding
Read 4,339
Write 54.5
Mixed 99
SusWrite 41.1
236% 1,133 MB/s
4K Read 754
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 2.7
1,147% 253 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 479%
Great: 347%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$23
931GB free
Firmware: CC63
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 180 193 193 195 192 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 185
Mixed 81
SusWrite 191
116% 159 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 106%
Great: 112%
Seagate Portable 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0712
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 118 115 111 119 115 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 92.5
Write 125
Mixed 82.5
SusWrite 114
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.7
167% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2K43DB1-CTD 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
44.9% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 13.4
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 9.9
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 120 23.8" 1280 720 HKC2431 24E3
Typical 90JF006BUS Builds (Compare 41 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 118%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO

System: Lenovo 90JF006BUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $635
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback