AZW SER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics18.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAZW SER  (all builds)
MotherboardAZW SER
Memory23.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230329
Uptime130.2 Days
Run DateJun 05 '24 at 21:02
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Memory 76.5
1-Core 152
2-Core 300
94% 176 Pts
4-Core 554
8-Core 783
84% 668 Pts
64-Core 969
60% 969 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
AMD(1002 0123) 3GB
Ram: 3GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Lighting 22.5
Reflection 21.6
Parallax 32.2
18% 25.4 fps
MRender 15.8
Gravity 26.6
Splatting 21.8
18% 21.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT500P3PSSD8 500GB
371GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR40A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 54 193 190 45 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
66% Good
Read 712
Write 1,521
Mixed 51.3
SusWrite 142
136% 606 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 32.6
4K Mixed 5.3
63% 21.2 MB/s
DQ Read 490
DQ Write 25.9
DQ Mixed 77.5
102% 198 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 66%
Great: 315%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFS832A.C8FF 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.2% Very good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 24.1
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 22.9
SC Write 34.9
SC Mixed 26.7
80% 28.2 GB/s
Latency 89.4
45% 89.4 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 44 10 75 27" 1920 1009 ACR06C0 VG270
Typical SER Builds (Compare 800 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: AZW SER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback