Gigabyte GA-W480M VISION W

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 147%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 150%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics161% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive244% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-W480M VISION W  (all builds)
Memory45.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200828
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJun 05 '24 at 05:50
Run Duration283 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-1270
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Memory 87
1-Core 146
2-Core 278
94% 170 Pts
4-Core 517
8-Core 936
87% 726 Pts
64-Core 1,513
94% 1,513 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$365
EVGA(3842 2384) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
161% Outstanding
Lighting 220
Reflection 214
Parallax 248
179% 227 fps
MRender 264
Gravity 224
Splatting 158
170% 215 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 161%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS100T3XHC-00SJG0 1TB
321GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 00WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1151 728 778 753 708 763 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
244% Outstanding
Read 1,949
Write 2,241
Mixed 1,836
SusWrite 814
385% 1,710 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 65.4
226% 83.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,167
DQ Write 940
DQ Mixed 1,062
793% 1,056 MB/s
Poor: 194%
This bench: 244%
Great: 334%
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
840GB free
Firmware: P3CR Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 961
Write 1,015
Mixed 788
206% 921 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 8.2
4K Mixed 7.8
63% 16.1 MB/s
DQ Read 303
DQ Write 4.3
DQ Mixed 6.7
42% 105 MB/s
Poor: 130% Great: 295%
Samsung 870 QVO 4TB-$294
2TB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 501
Write 477
Mixed 430
105% 469 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 88.2
4K Mixed 49.5
164% 57.7 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 354
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 70% Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$130
5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 134 93 0 62 150 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 64.8
Write 89
Mixed 60.8
SusWrite 91.3
56% 76.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.3
324% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 90%
Realtek RTL9210B-CG 512GB
456GB free
Firmware: 1.00
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 214
Write 401
Mixed 258
218% 291 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 38.7
4K Mixed 37.2
6,354% 37.3 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 163
DQ Mixed 60.5
856% 128 MB/s
Poor: 97% Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 33.6
MC Mixed 24.9
85% 29.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 36.3
SC Mixed 25.7
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 2 100 34" 1280 720 CMI3400 GM34-CW
Typical GA-W480M VISION W Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 166%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-W480M VISION W

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $497
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback